MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 17:07
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$350
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 232
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 776
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,225
82% 1,225 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$500
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 190
Parallax 119
94% 142 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 125
Splatting 107
99% 114 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 335 335 295 285 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 362
Write 362
Mixed 351
SusWrite 297
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 41.3
133% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 217
162% 216 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 134%
SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
57GB free
Firmware: 41060C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,399
Write 2,235
Mixed 1,646
466% 2,093 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 69.8
227% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 773
584% 789 MB/s
Poor: 204% Great: 411%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 302 304 303 304 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 398
Mixed 402
SusWrite 303
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 45.8
148% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 123%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$58
120GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,335
Write 2,213
Mixed 1,524
450% 2,024 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 65.4
224% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 770
563% 742 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 304%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
154GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 153 153 154 154 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 102
SusWrite 151
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 25.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2703 ASUS VG279Q1A
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 39,905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,017
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback