PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200514 |
Uptime | 7.8 Days |
Run Date | May 14 '22 at 09:47 |
Run Duration | 341 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-9600K-$210
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
92% 161 Pts
|
81% 630 Pts
|
52% 775 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
29% 38 fps
|
30% 33.8 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial MX500 1TB-$95
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 420 409 414 417 414 MB/s
|
90.5%
Outstanding
|
92% 409 MB/s
|
110% 38.4 MB/s
|
141% 242 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.6%
Very good
|
78% 27.3 GB/s
|
68% 23.8 GB/s
|
63% 63.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
69% | 27% | 91 | 221 | 128 | 120 | 23.8" | 1920 1080 | MSI3BA4 MSI G241 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $145Bench 85%, 261,521 samples | 902x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $210Bench 94%, 325,710 samples | 424x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $416Bench 97%, 515,820 samples | 328x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 373,446 samples | 295x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $390Bench 89%, 574,087 samples | 236x |
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $420Bench 100%, 280,324 samples | 200x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $501 |