Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20170609
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	May 13 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	98% Outstanding	Memory 95.9 1-Core 135 2-Core 267 93% 166 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 980 91% 759 Pts	64-Core 1,739 108% 1,739 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2665 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 159 Parallax 145 120% 150 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 149 Splatting 133 110% 134 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 458GB free Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 430 418 418 421 434 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 466 Mixed 390 SusWrite 429 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 50.2 172% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 261 221% 324 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 115%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 466GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 988 989 987 989 989 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	258% Outstanding	Read 1,980 Write 2,189 Mixed 1,748 SusWrite 1,048 392% 1,741 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 72 252% 93.9 MB/s	DQ Read 915 DQ Write 727 DQ Mixed 871 638% 838 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 258% Great: 297%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB 21,221 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 820GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 358 371 364 368 369 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 442 Mixed 381 SusWrite 370 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 45.2 161% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 257 217% 317 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 117%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB 5,255 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 110 110 111 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 91.9 Write 105 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 110 69% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.6 159% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	147% Outstanding	MC Read 59.9 MC Write 60.8 MC Mixed 54.2 167% 58.3 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 23.8 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 54.2 74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 149%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Designare EX-CF Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

CPU
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	56x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	52x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	43x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	15x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 122%, 173 samples	17x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 95%, 1,053 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 6,789 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $968

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)