Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 127% UFO	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	51.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210712
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 11 '22 at 17:52
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-11900K-$265 44,319 User benchmarks, average bench 103% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 76 2-Core 190 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 760 68% 572 Pts	64-Core 1,328 82% 1,328 Pts
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87B3) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	166% Outstanding	Lighting 233 Reflection 236 Parallax 236 190% 235 fps	MRender 235 Gravity 224 Splatting 169 167% 209 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW020T9 2TB 712 User benchmarks, average bench 256% 744GB free (System drive) Firmware: 001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 813 1008 149 105 95 411 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,270 Write 1,317 Mixed 888 SusWrite 430 219% 976 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 45.1 151% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 898 DQ Write 787 DQ Mixed 676 552% 787 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 313%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 3.5TB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 384 378 414 348 339 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 412 Mixed 399 SusWrite 364 91% 392 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 37.7 128% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 342 246% 314 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X32GC3200C16K2E 2x31.5GB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 32.2 96% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 21.8 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel $249Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	973x
Core i5-11600KIntel $181Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	718x
Core i9-11900KIntel $265Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	448x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	376x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	343x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	331x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	273x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	246x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	199x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	111x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 47,657 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	104x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16