Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH570
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 11:48
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 242
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 577
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2018) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 13
Parallax 11.6
7% 11 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 13
Splatting 10.3
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2018) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 152
Parallax 135
104% 138 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 109
Splatting 102
95% 118 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 100%
Great: 144%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
670GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1414 1808 2482 1853 1739 1917 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,527
Write 2,911
Mixed 2,378
SusWrite 1,869
546% 2,421 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 84.8
256% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 511
396% 542 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 321%
Great: 444%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
298GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1698 1588 1478 1318 1569 1574 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,012
Write 1,738
Mixed 1,484
SusWrite 1,538
380% 1,693 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 63.2
176% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 662
464% 579 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 255%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 31.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 15.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback