Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 10 '22 at 10:30
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 258 91% 161 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 1,003 93% 774 Pts	64-Core 1,011 63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3792) CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Lighting 98.3 Reflection 94.2 Parallax 83.7 80% 92.1 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 84.9 Splatting 75.8 63% 76.9 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 24 44 57 63 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 442 Write 363 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 71.9 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 11.7 57% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 53.6 DQ Mixed 32.3 37% 66 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 328GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 128 131 130 130 128 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 165 Write 146 Mixed 103 SusWrite 127 100% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 40.8 MC Mixed 31.3 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 41.7 SC Mixed 28.1 85% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,765 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,854x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,709x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,080x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	510x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	483x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	453x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	375x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	226x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $787

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16