PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | MEI Gxxx (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASRock B250 Pro 4 |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161209 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | May 09 '22 at 21:08 |
Run Duration | 208 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-7500-$200
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
62.3%
Good
|
65% 107 Pts
|
35% 255 Pts
|
19% 280 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53%
Above average
|
53% 64.8 fps
|
53% 63.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$170
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 61 55 58 63 57 MB/s
|
67.1%
Good
|
60% 268 MB/s
|
106% 38.1 MB/s
|
224% 313 MB/s
|
![]() Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$32
764GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 185 191 190 192 183 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
104% 144 MB/s
|
144% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix GKE800UD102408-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
56.9%
Above average
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
50% 79.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
55% | 35% | 43 | 164 | 19 | 60 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | ACI249A ASUS VS247 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-7500Intel $200Bench 75%, 135,882 samples | 185x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $320Bench 71%, 200,055 samples | 16x |
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $360Bench 73%, 131,813 samples | 4x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,449,936 samples | 138x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $138Bench 80%, 1,295,591 samples | 25x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 106%, 1,055,851 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $660 |