MSI MAG B460 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C81)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C81
MotherboardMSI MAG B460 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C81)  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 00:16
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 800
75% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,496
93% 1,496 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 101
Parallax 105
89% 105 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 86.8
82% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 295 207 207 161 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 394
Write 371
Mixed 231
SusWrite 210
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 42.2
117% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 244
210% 312 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 117%
WD Green SN350 1TB
844GB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 1195 1483 978 1229 1302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,732
Write 1,860
Mixed 1,277
SusWrite 1,185
340% 1,514 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 62.4
174% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 918
664% 864 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 235%
Great: 350%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
269GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 115 124 102 110 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 107
Write 76.5
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 110
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 112%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
722GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 101 100 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 57.4
Write 91.3
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 98.5
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
133% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 76%
WD Elements 1TB
188GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 69 66 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 10.2
Write 55.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 65.9
55% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-030.A00G 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 9905625-030.A00G 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.8% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B460 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C81) Builds (Compare 1,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B460 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C81)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $523
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback