Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	May 07 '22 at 11:42
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 101 2-Core 195 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 558 55% 448 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 30.1 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 30.6 24% 30.1 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 19.7 23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 25%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 838F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6344 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.55% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 7.6 6% 14.8 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 11.2 8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.55% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,602 Write 721 Mixed 538 208% 954 MB/s	4K Read 50.9 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 63.6 218% 75.2 MB/s	DQ Read 888 DQ Write 620 DQ Mixed 705 540% 738 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 335GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 111 113 114 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 119 Write 124 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 112 69% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 75%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 29GB free, PID 5400 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4.5 6.3 5.4 6.3 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	7.97% Terrible	Read 36 Write 17.2 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 5.6 16% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 31% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB 62,266 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 22 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 21.5 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,350x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	778x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	273x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16