Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 06 '22 at 12:18
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 74% 137 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 758 72% 595 Pts	64-Core 1,609 100% 1,609 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37A9) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.59 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.6% Excellent	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 181 Parallax 202 61% 152 fps	MRender 213 Gravity 180 Splatting 102 128% 165 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 757 449 417 401 414 413 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,965 Write 1,583 Mixed 1,250 SusWrite 475 294% 1,318 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 48.6 161% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 560 DQ Write 385 DQ Mixed 508 370% 485 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 340%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 198GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 409 407 393 387 388 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 366 Write 376 Mixed 284 SusWrite 396 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 25.6 85% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 235 204% 299 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 113%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 90GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1135 511 86 95 99 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,150 Write 1,142 Mixed 922 SusWrite 338 199% 888 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 56.4 172% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 684 DQ Write 601 DQ Mixed 274 306% 520 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 295%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 130GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 101 134 105 101 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 1,196 Write 1,040 Mixed 819 SusWrite 213 182% 817 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 37.5 131% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 628 DQ Write 583 DQ Mixed 273 296% 495 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 255%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 590GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 156 158 159 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 114 Mixed 100 SusWrite 158 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 109%
Asmedia ASM1153E 1TB 248 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 315GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 293 76 65 59 59 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 686GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 168 168 168 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 150 Mixed 105 SusWrite 167 106% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	157% Outstanding	MC Read 63.6 MC Write 62.4 MC Mixed 61.7 179% 62.6 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 40.5 SC Mixed 26.8 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 157%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 123%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 137%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	56x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	53x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	8x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 361 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $1,472

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16