Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '17 at 14:13
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	88%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 213 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 600 64% 510 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 120 Parallax 101 94% 112 fps	MRender 97.2 Gravity 105 Splatting 104 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3834 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 444 (B1) Unknown 95 95 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 50 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11892041106	79% Very good	Read 481 Write 267 Mixed 275 75% 341 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 29.1 122% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 51.5 DQ Mixed 73.2 73% 124 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 261GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698548 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1332 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7761 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1016 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1334 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1334 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 197569806372 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.6% Good	Read 111 Write 114 Mixed 112 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.17 68% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 77,652 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 18.4 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	217x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	130x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	72x

GPU
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	59x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	14x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	51x
ASU16D3LU1MNG/4G ASU16D3LFU1KBG/2G 6GBKingstonBench 41%, 371 samples	20x
M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 4,503 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16