Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Mobile Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8783
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '22 at 03:44
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 133 2-Core 106 70% 107 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 438 42% 345 Pts	64-Core 601 37% 601 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 39% HP(103C 8783) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.9% Below average	Lighting 45.4 Reflection 152 Parallax 45.3 37% 80.9 fps	MRender 53 Gravity 43.2 Splatting 48.9 40% 48.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 43%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8783) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 5.3 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX A4000 4,246 User benchmarks, average bench 132% HP(103C 14AD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 181 Reflection 191 Parallax 186 148% 186 fps	MRender 148 Gravity 143 Splatting 139 117% 144 fps
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 137%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TB 8,018 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 769GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXF SusWrite @10s intervals: 1488 1638 1476 1534 1475 1530 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 1,879 Write 1,864 Mixed 1,396 SusWrite 1,524 375% 1,666 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 54.7 178% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 440 DQ Write 609 DQ Mixed 498 384% 516 MB/s
Poor: 155% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 333%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB 2,443 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 450GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20% Poor	Read 35.1 Write 39.7 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 41.2 9% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 14.9 48% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 24.4 DQ Mixed 24.5 18% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK 1x31GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 13.5 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	323x
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples	143x
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 566 samples	100x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	84x
KIOXIA 1TBKxg60znv1t02Bench 208%, 4,378 samples	79x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	77x

RAM
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-XN 1x31GBHynixBench 48%, 958 samples	69x
16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 1x31GBMicronBench 49%, 283 samples	46x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	42x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16