Asrock B450 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime10 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 22:07
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 118
2-Core 232
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 674
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$275
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 118
Parallax 124
107% 125 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 105
Splatting 90.1
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 92 88 82 83 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 451
Mixed 396
SusWrite 122
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 51
168% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 364
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 124%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
86GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 173 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 506
Write 458
Mixed 409
SusWrite 106
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 26.5
120% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 32.2
86% 175 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 92%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2079 2108 2108 1978 1445 1453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,464
Write 2,051
Mixed 1877
SusWrite 1,862
463% 2,063 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 71
233% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 774
561% 737 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 317%
Great: 435%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
381GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 81 92 91 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 82.2
Write 80.9
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 89.1
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
455GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 106 108 110 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 103
Write 99.6
Mixed 60
SusWrite 109
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
831GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 197 203 203 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 162
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 202
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $373
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback