PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A38 |
Motherboard | MSI A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200706 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 24 '22 at 17:42 |
Run Duration | 340 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 97% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
40.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 62 67 64 67 65 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
231GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 117 120 116 99 111 MB/s
|
67.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
696GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 97 65 64 72 68 MB/s
|
||||
Generic External 1TB
673GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 8 15 23 20 MB/s
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 25x |
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples | 18x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 21x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $313 |