PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B51 |
Motherboard | MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190808 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 23 '22 at 00:20 |
Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
Run User | TUN-User |
Background CPU | 57% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 235 419 405 129 145 MB/s
|
93.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Team T2535T240G 240GB
85GB free
Firmware: 4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 244 28 27 45 45 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
500GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 164 167 168 166 168 MB/s
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
411GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 139 126 152 150 150 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
ST950032 5AS 500GB
191GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
59.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 5,558x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 5,235x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 2,945x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1,620x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,541x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,318x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Outstanding | Total price: $986 |