MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 00:20
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 233
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 612
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 43.1
Parallax 38.7
31% 39.8 fps
MRender 46.3
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 23.4
26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 235 419 405 129 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 143
Mixed 480
SusWrite 250
60% 262 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 42.1
150% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 264
275% 462 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 246%
Team T2535T240G 240GB
85GB free
Firmware: 4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 244 28 27 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 382
Write 297
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 84.1
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.7
25% 7.67 MB/s
DQ Read 58.5
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 0.7
9% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
500GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 164 167 168 166 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 77
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 163
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
411GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 139 126 152 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 165
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 145
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 107%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
191GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 36.7
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 38.6
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 22,694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $986
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback