Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 24 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 17:18
Run Duration338 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 291
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,048
97% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,488
92% 1,488 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.01.01
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 92.6
55% 74.7 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 47.2
50% 63.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
101GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 314 318 318 318 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 450
Write 425
Mixed 416
SusWrite 328
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 38.2
126% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 95.9
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 113
94% 133 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 118%
Sabrent Rocket 4 1TB
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1310 711 813 891 846 828 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 94 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.86% Terrible
Read 58.9
Write 77
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 92.3
17% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 3.43 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 2.8
DQ Mixed 1.5
1% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HDS5C301 1.5TB
105GB free
Firmware: ML5O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 80 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 76.9
Write 81.5
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 78.3
47% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 65%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
78GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 105 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 103
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 73%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
1TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 127 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 103
Mixed 46
SusWrite 125
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 96%
WD WD160EDGZ-11 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 85.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 210 227 226 222 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 121%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 145 164 169 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 120
Write 174
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 155
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 87%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
13TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 198 208 195 205 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 230
Mixed 204
SusWrite 203
293% 215 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 1.2
375% 7 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 1.7
402% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 106%
Great: 103%
WD Elements 2TB
10GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 39 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 37.6
Write 38.3
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 39.3
49% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,495
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback