MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics218% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '22 at 17:22
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 254
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 750
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Lighting 328
Reflection 278
Parallax 350
267% 319 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 260
Splatting 185
209% 267 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 218%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
503GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 1860 1801 1148 1146 1147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,569
Write 2,396
Mixed 1,666
SusWrite 1,382
449% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 100
340% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,482
DQ Write 1,230
DQ Mixed 1,324
1,000% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 353%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
216GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 494 494 494 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 493
Mixed 463
SusWrite 493
111% 492 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 63.6
217% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 361
271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
197GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 494 494 494 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 491
Mixed 456
SusWrite 494
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 69.2
230% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
109GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,562
Write 2,400
Mixed 1,731
496% 2,231 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 99.8
341% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,518
DQ Write 1,279
DQ Mixed 1,334
1,017% 1,377 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 201 202 202 200 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 211
Mixed 105
SusWrite 201
131% 179 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB-$85
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 24.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 28.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $601
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback