Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 175% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 173% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '22 at 13:31
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 90.3 1-Core 138 2-Core 288 94% 172 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 922 86% 716 Pts	64-Core 1,393 86% 1,393 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 403F) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	191% Outstanding	Lighting 276 Reflection 256 Parallax 315 225% 282 fps	MRender 321 Gravity 233 Splatting 175 191% 243 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 553GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1673 1714 2166 2156 1139 315 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 1,663 Write 1,856 Mixed 1722 SusWrite 1,527 382% 1,692 MB/s	4K Read 57.3 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 50.7 185% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,116 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 240 276% 502 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 102GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1374 714 603 560 548 516 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 2,483 Write 1,605 Mixed 1,647 SusWrite 719 359% 1,614 MB/s	4K Read 63.4 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 55.8 201% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,184 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 217 271% 511 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 410%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 110GB free Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 323 334 332 218 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 373 Write 413 Mixed 245 SusWrite 304 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 21.6 84% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 154 117% 160 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 104%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 56GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 344 349 320 232 322 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 492 Write 355 Mixed 318 SusWrite 320 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 37.5 130% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 168 136% 192 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 55GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 99 99 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 97 Write 99.3 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 98.3 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 68%
Seagate ST31000424CS 1TB 1,846 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 602GB free Firmware: CA13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 104 103 103 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 108 Write 94 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 102 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 62%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 3TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 113 117 121 113 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 158 Write 167 Mixed 100 SusWrite 116 100% 135 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1 300% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB 17,559 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.4% Outstanding	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 35.1 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 27.6 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 34.2 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,643x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,410x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,235x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16