ECS P4M890T-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	ECS P4M890T-M (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070523
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '17 at 09:37
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6400 5,556 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 24.2 2-Core 40.5 31% 42.9 Pts	4-Core 42.4 8-Core 47.8 6% 45.1 Pts	64-Core 48.5 3% 48.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 34D6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.03 Reflection 6.42 Parallax 1.62 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 4.39 4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SP0842N 80GB 675 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 49GB free Firmware: BH100-45 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 4416 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8049 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12918 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4384 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 2931 (BE) vendor-specific 82 61 52 (C2) HDA temperature 82 61 52 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 846289 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	32.8% Below average	Read 56.4 Write 57.4 Mixed 34.4 37% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.44 105% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.01E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 166 163 2691 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7873 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11421 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4573 (BE) vendor-specific 56 42 44 (C2) HDA temperature 99 85 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27.8% Poor	Read 48.2 Write 48.1 Mixed 46.9 36% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.51 117% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 33%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 19GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 19.2 Mixed 20.7 27% 22 MB/s	4K Read 5.14 4K Write 3.18 4K Mixed 1.53 179% 3.28 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.1 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 2.5 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P4M890T-M Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS P4M890T-M

CPU
Pentium Dual E2140Intel $80Bench 31%, 2,489 samples	1x
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 7300 GSNvidiaBench 0%, 41 samples	1x
Tesla C2050NvidiaBench 16%, 87 samples	1x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

ECS P4M890T-M

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: ECS P4M890T-M

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)