ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '22 at 00:05
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 79 1-Core 100 2-Core 201 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 800 70% 597 Pts	64-Core 1,615 100% 1,615 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit) 10,656 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8477) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 23.4 Parallax 29.2 16% 24.2 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 27.6 Splatting 24 22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 SATA 256GB 1,249 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: K8DA4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 240 239 239 260 260 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 364 Write 231 Mixed 198 SusWrite 243 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 22.3 72% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 159 147% 231 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 83%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 66 Write 53.2 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 71 44% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 44%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 466GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 83 79 79 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 73.2 Write 51.9 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 79.8 48% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 865GB free, PID d000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 142 141 144 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 117 Write 116 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 141 134% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46 47,721 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.2% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 14.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback