Intel RaptorLake-Px LP5 ERB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 87% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIntel Raptor Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel RaptorLake-Px LP5 ERB  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220407
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 14:10
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 87%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Memory 69.5
1-Core 210
2-Core 420
118% 233 Pts
4-Core 779
8-Core 1,312
127% 1,045 Pts
64-Core 2050
127% 2050 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 30.7
21% 29.1 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WDS250G2B0C-00PXH0 250GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 132 135 140 135 134 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
162% Outstanding
MC Read 69.3
MC Write 59.3
MC Mixed 60.6
180% 63.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 31.9
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 162%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback