MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D50
MotherboardMSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 23:15
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 174
2-Core 345
110% 204 Pts
4-Core 674
8-Core 1265
116% 969 Pts
64-Core 2,250
139% 2,250 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 62.9
51% 65.2 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 55
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2547 2101 1498 1487 1509 1504 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,689
Write 2,600
Mixed 2,004
SusWrite 1,774
509% 2,267 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 99.1
334% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,340
DQ Write 1,035
DQ Mixed 1,163
877% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 372%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
931GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,258
Write 71
Mixed 135
724% 3,488 MB/s
4K Read 835
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 8.5
1,278% 282 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
931GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,212
Write 71.4
Mixed 135
721% 3,473 MB/s
4K Read 840
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 8.6
1,285% 284 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,175
Write 71.3
Mixed 134
718% 3,460 MB/s
4K Read 836
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 3.7
1,274% 281 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,299
Write 50.8
Mixed 123
2,498% 3,491 MB/s
4K Read 842
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 7.4
35,980% 284 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,210
Write 52.9
Mixed 122
2,477% 3,462 MB/s
4K Read 840
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 7.2
35,883% 284 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 68.1
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 41.9
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 36.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 133%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50) Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,829
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback