HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8390
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '22 at 18:57
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 85 1-Core 110 2-Core 166 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 574 57% 465 Pts	64-Core 566 35% 566 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Asus(1043 8827) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (139 fps cap detected)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 140 Parallax 138 114% 139 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 128 Splatting 112 102% 126 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 115 104 98 92 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,498 Write 399 Mixed 494 SusWrite 110 136% 625 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 81.4 4K Mixed 54.5 183% 60.8 MB/s	DQ Read 522 DQ Write 376 DQ Mixed 453 337% 450 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 317%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 225GB free Firmware: 415020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 210 213 210 211 213 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 462 Write 264 Mixed 224 SusWrite 221 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 29.8 121% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 163 165% 270 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FN Kingston HP24D4S7S8MBP-8 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22.2 78% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 23.5 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,368x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	964x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,347x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	777x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	272x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16