Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 07:21
Run Duration405 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$299
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 220
83% 142 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 643
65% 512 Pts
64-Core 638
43% 638 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$138
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 115
Parallax 116
84% 112 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 105
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$224
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 445 200 151 150 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 451
Mixed 398
SusWrite 259
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 62.8
209% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 343
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 116%
Great: 132%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
169GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 290 287 276 264 251 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 484
Mixed 462
SusWrite 306
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.4
211% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 339
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
CT1000P5PSSD8 1TB
825GB free
Firmware: P7CR402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2396 2385 2391 2065 1248 1202 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,637
Write 2,399
Mixed 2,052
SusWrite 1,948
508% 2,259 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 73.2
250% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,358
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 1,194
900% 1,211 MB/s
Poor: 233%
This bench: 356%
Great: 569%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$64
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 164 164 164 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 138
Mixed 106
SusWrite 163
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 180 180 181 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 165
Mixed 113
SusWrite 180
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 33: 5R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 36% 25 275 196 50 34" 3440 1440 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
History: Score 32: 3R 4G 5B | Score 40: 8R 0G 0B | Score 33: 5R 2G 2B
Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 26,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $900
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $258Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $118
Intel Core i7-12700K $380Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback