Acer Aspire MC605

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Acer Aspire MC605 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire MC605
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121026
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '22 at 16:52
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 198 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 508 52% 420 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 473.04 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.3% Very good	Lighting 95 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 89.7 77% 71.8 fps	MRender 99.9 Gravity 90.4 Splatting 76 71% 88.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 48GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 29 29 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12% Very poor	Read 32 Write 27.7 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 29.4 7% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 8 27% 8.03 MB/s	DQ Read 15.5 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 15.1 11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 97%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 33GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,604 Write 4737 Mixed 5,257 1,160% 5,199 MB/s	4K Read 548 4K Write 284 4K Mixed 130 1,146% 320 MB/s	DQ Read 1,022 DQ Write 702 DQ Mixed 865 645% 863 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 108 139 100 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 15.8 Write 87 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 105 44% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0 13% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 1TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 168GB free, PID a0a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 25 Mixed 22 SusWrite 26.7 35% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 19,207 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.4 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire MC605 Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire MC605

CPU
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	84x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	40x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	27x

GPU
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	61x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	46x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	25x

SSD
M500 240GBCrucial $54Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	17x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	16x
Solid 240GBBench 55%, 353 samples	13x

RAM
ACR512X64D3U16C11G ACR256X64D3U16C11G 6GBKingstonBench 37%, 366 samples	14x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Kingston ACR512X64D3U16C11G 8GBHynixBench 49%, 18 samples	13x
ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,001 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16