ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 92289GU

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	IBM 92289GU (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM 9228
Memory	30.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090318
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '17 at 01:38
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5365 71 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 34.8 2-Core 69.1 37% 56.2 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 136 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 8301) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7.67% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 4.75 8% 7.9 fps	MRender 8.57 Gravity 8.17 Splatting 6.22 6% 7.65 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.67% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB 5,131 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 710 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 36 (64) Unknown 100 100 1120153 (A8) Unknown 100 100 6 (A9) Unknown 98 98 24 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 23 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 5 (B2) Unknown 100 100 51 (B3) Unknown 100 100 284 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6596 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 0 68722098202 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 97 89 114 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1433 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1676 (F2) Unknown 100 100 243 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 4895	50% Above average	Read 255 Write 176 Mixed 183 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 14.8 88% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 14.9 30% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 106%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40 5,497 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 425GB free Firmware: K2AOA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 160 160 201 (03) Spinup time 103 103 55879074462 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 847 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 31 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 92639 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 81 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1521 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1521 (C2) HDA temperature 203 203 193274576923 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	27.7% Poor	Read 47.1 Write 48.7 Mixed 48.3 36% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.37 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 34%
Seagate ST925032 0AS 250GB 1,499 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 232GB free Firmware: HP07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 80764955 (03) Spinup time 99 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4745 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 154706941 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9042 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4243 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 43 39041826839 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 54 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2597 (C2) HDA temperature 23 57 51539607575 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 34 80764955 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	37.7% Below average	Read 66 Write 65.3 Mixed 67 50% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.31 76% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 148%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback