Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 18:55
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 37
2-Core 73.5
42% 62 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 198
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8555) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.4% Poor
Lighting 29.7
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 29.4
24% 31.8 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 27.9
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
185GB free
Firmware: MU01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 57 53 50 51 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44% Average
Read 295
Write 250
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 84
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 17.7
57% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 76.9
94% 164 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 44%
Great: 91%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
25GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 172 213 230 155 296 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 122
Write 80.2
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 216
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 7.2
27% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 14.6
12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 100%
Storejet Transcend 240GB
133GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 28 26 27 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.33% Terrible
Read 25.9
Write 25.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 26.9
6% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 4.2
15% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 146 145 148 132 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 161
Write 150
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 145
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.4
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback