IBM 9210EU6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIBM 9210EU6  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM IBM
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 x 65536 colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '17 at 23:31
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
LGA775/PSC/TJS, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 50.3
1-Core 15.4
2-Core 25.9
23% 30.5 Pts
4-Core 25.9
8-Core 24.3
3% 25.1 Pts
64-Core 23.7
2% 23.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDP725032GLAT80 320GB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM3OA42A Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 30
Write 29.6
Mixed 16.5
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.32
85% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 44%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
42GB free, PID 61f3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 33
Write 26
Mixed 29.2
37% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.46
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 3.87
370% 5.84 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 360%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.58% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.58%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback