Acer Predator PH317-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienna_KLS
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 20:31
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 147
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 373
42% 327 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1207) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1215
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 62
Parallax 61.8
48% 61 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 53.5
45% 55 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 160 214 202 68 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 628
Write 467
Mixed 518
SusWrite 154
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 109
162% 295 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 157%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
511GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 117 116 117 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 118
Write 95.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 115
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.8
244% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.3% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-51 Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback