Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170825
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 19:21
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 79.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 804 77% 635 Pts	64-Core 1,212 75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PowerColor(148C 2343) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1090 MHz, MLim: 1460 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 72.1 Reflection 63.8 Parallax 87.2 59% 74.3 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 58 Splatting 82.6 57% 68 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 697GB free Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8109 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 308 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 37 (AE) Unknown 100 100 128 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 50 214749544478 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 22973748792 (F7) Unknown 100 100 720037533 (F8) Unknown 100 100 568879543 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3547 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	68.1% Good	Read 483 Write 345 Mixed 339 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 13.6 89% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 64 DQ Mixed 39.2 32% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 104%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 462GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1,966 Write 1,478 Mixed 1,208 343% 1,550 MB/s	4K Read 51.9 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 42 179% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 27.7 67% 143 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 302%
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109 10,807 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 119GB free Firmware: Z2201000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 87 100 87 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 367 (A6) Unknown 100 100 58 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 110 (A9) Unknown 100 100 210 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 93 (AE) Unknown 100 100 108 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 100 249108103205 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2 (E8) Unknown 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 9135 (F1) Unknown 253 253 925 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1554	58.9% Above average	Read 467 Write 174 Mixed 253 65% 298 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 3.9 84% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 23.4 53% 108 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 71%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 178 5858 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7433 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 16826 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 425 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 125 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 89331 (C2) HDA temperature 124 106 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.3% Good	Read 120 Write 118 Mixed 116 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.25 103% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 84%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 14GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 137 Write 30.9 Mixed 30.5 63% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 0.27 4K Mixed 0.26 60% 3.96 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 30,689 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92.8% Outstanding	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 32.2 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.5 SC Write 36.2 SC Mixed 26.5 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)