Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160713
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 19:10
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 201 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 867 76% 646 Pts	64-Core 1,434 89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 162 Parallax 170 98% 150 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 139 Splatting 117 101% 124 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 960GB-$489 164 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C5005T5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 375 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 1 100 3777 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 269 (64) Unknown 100 100 4487552 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 10 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 16 (B2) Unknown 100 100 68 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 37679 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 52 100 309239087156 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 375 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 375 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 16053 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7141 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3425 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 1382	135% Outstanding	Read 1,094 Write 967 Mixed 894 219% 985 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 16.4 72% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 11.1 72% 166 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 172%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 139 139 30089871742 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2675 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3775 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 272 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2681 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2681 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 253404577836 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	112% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 194 Mixed 182 144% 191 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 3.08 4K Mixed 0.61 165% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 108 (03) Spinup time 140 140 30089216389 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1451 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3775 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 272 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1517 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1517 (C2) HDA temperature 113 113 236224708661 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	91.2% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 153 Mixed 157 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 3.02 4K Mixed 0.57 160% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 113%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 276GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 34 Write 33.6 Mixed 12.3 32% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.11 51% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB 2,054 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 32 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 23.5 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	138x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	78x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x

SSD
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $120Bench 421%, 18,218 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	14x
9965600-033.A00G 4x16GBUnknownBench 99%, 23 samples	9x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $623

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16