Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200415
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 18:40
Run Duration366 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$660
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 188
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 661
58% 481 Pts
64-Core 1,164
78% 1,164 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.4% Good
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 68.9
54% 72.4 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 87.1
Splatting 74
67% 75 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 105%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$89
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 152 108 168 138 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 383
Write 354
Mixed 326
SusWrite 170
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 31
101% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$110
323GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 435 427 363 364 356 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 355
Write 358
Mixed 330
SusWrite 394
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 30.2
101% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 327
248% 333 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 123%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$50
481GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 88 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 117
Write 103
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 86.4
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 67%
Adata HD720 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 75 69 64 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 129
Write 150
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 70.2
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
210% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 71%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 72 70 64 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 134
Write 151
Mixed 66
SusWrite 69.2
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 104%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 78 76 68 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 92.7
Write 83
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 74.1
105% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.7
235% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 63%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 79 77 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 175
Write 164
Mixed 116
SusWrite 74.4
172% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 101%
WD My Book 1170 2TB
441GB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 72 71 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 73.3
Write 72.9
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 69
93% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 50%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
260GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 53.9
Write 59.7
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 60.5
76% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 19.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 35: 3R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 18% 74 281 197 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACI22E5 VX229
History: Score 16: 1R 2G 5B | Score 29: 3R 4G 2B | Score 19: 1R 3G 5B | Score 35: 3R 5G 5B
Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 5,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $280Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $111
Intel Core i7-12700K $380Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback