PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 14.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200415 |
Uptime | 5 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '22 at 18:40 |
Run Duration | 366 Seconds |
Run User | IRN-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i9-9900K-$660
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
|
73.4%
Very good
|
74% 124 Pts
|
58% 481 Pts
|
78% 1,164 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
60.4%
Good
|
54% 72.4 fps
|
67% 75 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$89
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 152 108 168 138 132 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
69% 308 MB/s
|
101% 35.4 MB/s
|
257% 344 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$110
323GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 435 427 363 364 356 MB/s
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
81% 359 MB/s
|
101% 37 MB/s
|
248% 333 MB/s
|
![]() WD Green 2TB (2011)-$50
481GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 88 85 85 MB/s
|
58.4%
Above average
|
68% 93 MB/s
|
165% 1.3 MB/s
|
|
![]() Adata HD720 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 75 69 64 65 MB/s
|
57.5%
Above average
|
74% 101 MB/s
|
210% 2.23 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 72 70 64 62 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
198% 2.4 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD My Passport 2627 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 78 76 68 67 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
105% 78.9 MB/s
|
235% 2.6 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD My Book 25EE 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 79 77 69 69 MB/s
|
49.8%
Average
|
172% 132 MB/s
|
126% 1.5 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD My Book 1170 2TB
441GB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 72 71 64 65 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
93% 68.4 MB/s
|
78% 1 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD My Passport 2627 4TB
260GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 60 60 MB/s
|
27.9%
Poor
|
76% 55 MB/s
|
104% 1.2 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
62.5%
Good
|
65% 22.6 GB/s
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
61% 65.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
35% | 18% | 74 | 281 | 197 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | ACI22E5 VX229 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $367Bench 96%, 505,453 samples | 1,492x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $660Bench 96%, 479,734 samples | 1,071x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $233Bench 93%, 351,198 samples | 995x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $500Bench 118%, 582,676 samples | 504x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 106%, 475,843 samples | 420x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $331Bench 89%, 595,256 samples | 362x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $1,300 |