HP 810-209

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 810-209 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140529
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 06:52
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 483 55% 432 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.3% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 64.5 Parallax 56.6 54% 62.5 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 61.1 Splatting 61.4 52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB 1,744 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM10H6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3092 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1089 (AA) Unknown 100 100 2288 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 89 89 367 (AE) Unknown 99 99 86 (B7) Unknown 99 99 209 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 29 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 429	70.5% Very good	Read 497 Write 293 Mixed 269 78% 353 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 16.9 80% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 62.7 84% 155 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 879GB free Firmware: 0911 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 127 Write 120 Mixed 94.5 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 7.36 4K Mixed 0.4 200% 2.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 87%
Asmt 2115 1TB 1,671 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 428GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 33.7 Write 24.8 Mixed 27.6 22% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.21 47% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 257GB free Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 189558672 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4102 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 23802779 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3538 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1095 (B4) Unknown 100 100 822423681 (B7) Unknown 95 95 5 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 60130527516 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 73 63 488243227 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 69 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 9777 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 47244640283 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 196 21244	74.4% Very good	Read 141 Write 118 Mixed 141 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.17 69% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 114%
NORELSYS 106X 4TB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 157 Write 154 Mixed 124 184% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.65 4K Mixed 0.004 94% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.5% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-209 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: HP 810-209

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	8x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 3,024 samples	5x
MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GBSamsungBench 81%, 1,744 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBMicronBench 43%, 122 samples	3x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 95 samples	3x
HP698651-154-KEF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GBKingstonBench 39%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16