HP xw8400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP xw8400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A08h
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060829
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '15 at 09:28
Run Duration	405 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 5160 323 User benchmarks, average bench 36% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 34.4 2-Core 66.1 23% 50.2 Pts	4-Core 65.3 8-Core 64.2 9% 64.8 Pts	64-Core 64.8 4% 64.8 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4500 309 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 02AF) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.745 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 0.44 2% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB 3,876 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2GB free Firmware: 0K05 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 94.9 Write 77.2 Mixed 77.3 62% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.34 91% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA3 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: ABB0 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 96.9 Write 104 Mixed 97.2 75% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.21 62% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 119%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1GB free Firmware: 1A01 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 54.3 Write 38.6 Mixed 28.5 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.24 58% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 57%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB 460 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 0GB free Firmware: AA10 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 157 Write 142 Mixed 114 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.46 121% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 88%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 2GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	9.16% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 6.04 Mixed 11 14% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.65 77% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.16% Great: 27%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 15.4 Mixed 24.9 28% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 1.95 123% 3.01 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical xw8400 Workstation Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP xw8400 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	5x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	4x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	2x
Torch 240GBPatriot $73Bench 61%, 51 samples	2x

RAM
65GBUnknownBench 19%, 1,017 samples	17x
49GBUnknownBench 18%, 1,461 samples	9x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP xw8400 Workstation

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP xw8400 Workstation

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)