Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10200H 5,051 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 173 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 344 37% 296 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.65% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 62.7 Parallax 3.9 2% 23.2 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 0.1 3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.65% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 265 54 111 59 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,414 Write 920 Mixed 869 SusWrite 103 183% 826 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 61.8 211% 73.2 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 366 DQ Mixed 340 259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB 34,565 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 12.3 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 7.7 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	1x
Core i5-10200HIntelBench 73%, 5,051 samples	1x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	1x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	1x

SSD
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	1x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	1x

RAM
CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 70%, 2,090 samples	1x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	1x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16