Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B45
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45) (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '22 at 11:00
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 928 88% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,306 81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 3800) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 59.5 Parallax 51.4 50% 57.5 fps	MRender 41.7 Gravity 55.7 Splatting 45.8 39% 47.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 149 163 67 71 105 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.3% Poor	Read 64.1 Write 78 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 109 16% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 21.1 38% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 44.1 DQ Write 80 DQ Mixed 82.7 57% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 91%
WDC WD181KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 15.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 205 205 206 202 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 250 Write 247 Mixed 142 SusWrite 204 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 0.6 19% 6.87 MB/s	DQ Read 1.8 DQ Write 6.6 DQ Mixed 6.3 4% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4000 C19 Series 2x8GB 4,474 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.5% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 19.6 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 20.9 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 137%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	98x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	84x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	75x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	120x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	87x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	78x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,094

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16