| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock X370M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180620 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 14 '22 at 15:18 |
| Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
| Run User | SGP-User |
| Background CPU | 53% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.4%
Above average
|
64% 120 Pts
|
47% 365 Pts
|
31% 507 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Zotac(19DA 3571) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
82.5%
Excellent
|
88% 100 fps
|
71% 92.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 85 71 12 151 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
42% 189 MB/s
|
60% 21.9 MB/s
|
130% 208 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
39GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 130 139 136 157 119 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
119% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown IM48GU88N26-GIIHMB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
51.9%
Above average
|
56% 19.5 GB/s
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
28% 145 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 23x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 7x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 16x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $283 |