Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZW_GU603ZW

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	365% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZW_GU603ZW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU603ZW
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '22 at 01:26
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	89%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-12900H 15,403 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 72 1-Core 194 2-Core 376 110% 214 Pts	4-Core 739 8-Core 1,263 121% 1,001 Pts	64-Core 2,154 133% 2,154 Pts
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A8C) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1029 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 181 Parallax 25.5 18% 76.2 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 1 1% 1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB 2,164 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 868GB free (System drive) Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3194 3120 1584 1401 1396 1384 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	365% Outstanding	Read 1,656 Write 3,256 Mixed 1,792 SusWrite 2,013 495% 2,179 MB/s	4K Read 70.4 4K Write 298 4K Mixed 89.9 379% 153 MB/s	DQ Read 1,564 DQ Write 1,170 DQ Mixed 1,316 998% 1,350 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 365% Great: 349%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN750 SE 1TB 914GB free Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2486 2557 1583 245 187 249 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GB 1,385 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 4800, 4800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	115% Outstanding	MC Read 47.9 MC Write 41.9 MC Mixed 43.6 127% 44.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 38.5 SC Mixed 20.9 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 96.9 41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZW_GU603ZW Builds (Compare 2,097 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 120%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 126%

UFO

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZW_GU603ZW

CPU
Core i9-12900HIntelBench 99%, 15,403 samples	2,095x
Gen Intel Core i9-12900H12thBench 109%, 2 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 119%, 9,134 samples	1,257x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	811x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	27x

SSD
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBNvmeBench 244%, 2,164 samples	1,304x
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBNvmeBench 407%, 6,767 samples	287x
Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TBNvmeBench 404%, 3,576 samples	69x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 16GBSamsungBench 127%, 2,382 samples	553x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GBSamsungBench 119%, 1,385 samples	454x
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL Micron MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 32GBSamsungBench 136%, 669 samples	263x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16