Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 870-2XX (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 830C
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '22 at 18:12
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 199 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 547 57% 458 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% EVGA(3842 3797) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	164% Outstanding	Lighting 244 Reflection 216 Parallax 208 199% 223 fps	MRender 256 Gravity 159 Splatting 130 143% 182 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 589GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1286 1012 996 1035 1040 1009 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 2366 Write 1,995 Mixed 1,332 SusWrite 1,063 377% 1,689 MB/s	4K Read 52.4 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 79.2 259% 92.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,165 DQ Write 970 DQ Mixed 926 732% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 372%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 31GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 57 65 73 80 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 66.1 Write 92.8 Mixed 45.7 SusWrite 69.1 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 549GB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 107 105 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 153 Write 157 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 105 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB 6,220 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 23 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 19.3 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	70x
SD8SB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,064 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	311x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 5,278 samples	200x
HP24D4U7S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 895 samples	68x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $344

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16