Today's hottest deals

Colorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemColorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 10:44
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11500-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 59
1-Core 144
2-Core 291
85% 165 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 824
86% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,111
69% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
23% Poor
Lighting 29.7
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 38.4
24% 33.9 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 21.7
21% 25.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron MTFDHBA51 512GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3009P4LN Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1799 1856 1616 958 447 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,086
Write 1,927
Mixed 1,428
SusWrite 1,189
372% 1,658 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 51.1
166% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 1,121
779% 967 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 247%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: Colorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback