Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 150% UFO	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 161% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210427
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '22 at 08:36
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$260 21,040 User benchmarks, average bench 99% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 95.4 1-Core 154 2-Core 263 96% 171 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 1051 97% 810 Pts	64-Core 2,030 126% 2,030 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% MSI(1462 3909) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	149% Outstanding	Lighting 216 Reflection 210 Parallax 200 176% 209 fps	MRender 202 Gravity 152 Splatting 136 130% 163 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 351GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 409 362 322 417 421 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 472 Mixed 402 SusWrite 398 98% 437 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 46.5 150% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 319 244% 329 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 32GB free Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 66 83 64 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 1,513 Write 440 Mixed 123 SusWrite 68 115% 536 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 45 160% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 612 DQ Write 59.7 DQ Mixed 93.1 129% 255 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 242%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 638GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.7% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 38.3 Mixed 36.4 SusWrite 23.2 8% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 13.4 44% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 24.1 DQ Mixed 22.9 18% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 99%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1TB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 477 475 478 478 479 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 477 Mixed 427 SusWrite 477 106% 472 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 45.1 147% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 337 254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 983GB free Firmware: CC4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 175 159 174 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 175 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 171 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 882GB free Firmware: 0604 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 36.1 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 19.5 20% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 103%
WD My Passport 260D 2TB 1,129 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 835GB free, PID 260d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 92 91 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	49% Average	Read 110 Write 104 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 91.8 121% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3600 Kingston KHX3600C17D4/8GX DDR4 3600 Kingston KHX3600C17D4/8GX 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2667, 2400, 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 42.7 MC Mixed 31.7 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 49.5 SC Mixed 30.4 95% 33.4 GB/s	Latency 55.9 72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	697x
Core i5-11400Intel $134Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	478x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	416x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	675x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	498x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	359x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	235x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	134x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	128x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	232x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	201x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	178x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $484

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16