Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results


Gaming 123% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '22 at 12:24
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	99%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 83.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 239 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 643 68% 542 Pts	64-Core 755 47% 755 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 4069) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	149% Outstanding	Lighting 220 Reflection 199 Parallax 203 179% 207 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 151 Splatting 135 125% 156 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D256 256GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20901 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 148 153 140 151 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 1,316 Write 120 Mixed 215 SusWrite 151 96% 451 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 29.8 131% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 36.2 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 212 128% 132 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 224%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 316GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 413 422 401 401 422 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 430 Write 377 Mixed 374 SusWrite 416 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 46.7 147% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 323 243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2666C18-16GRS 04CD F4-2666C19-16GRS 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.6% Excellent	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 24.7 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 34.1 SC Mixed 26.3 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,019x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	442x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	273x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	271x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	156x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	761x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16