PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200514 |
Uptime | 5.6 Days |
Run Date | Feb 17 '22 at 00:18 |
Run Duration | 223 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 88% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$187
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 266 289 257 237 252 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate BarraCuda Q5 ZP1000CV30001 1TB
630GB free
Firmware: SU5SH017
SusWrite @10s intervals: 776 367 188 181 140 158 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
223GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 237 249 247 189 196 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
276GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 176 178 179 171 174 MB/s
|
77.1%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
364GB free
Firmware: SD22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 101 104 103 101 104 MB/s
|
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 561x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 261x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 236x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 171x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $200Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 150x |
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 142x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $575 |