PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20211207 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 15 '22 at 06:50 |
Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 225 216 200 182 166 MB/s
|
83%
Excellent
|
|||
51.5%
Above average
|
||||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
826GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 158 150 158 157 MB/s
|
91.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 124 125 124 124 MB/s
|
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,227x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,026x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 854x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 735x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 373x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 222x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |