Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120511
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '17 at 23:04
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 63.1 2-Core 124 52% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 231 29% 222 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.3% Poor	Lighting 30.3 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 38.4 25% 33 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 35.3 Splatting 25.9 26% 33.4 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 26091 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 879 (B1) Unknown 84 84 182 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 57 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 140 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33532035664	43.6% Average	Read 225 Write 152 Mixed 156 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 15.9 78% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 37.8 DQ Write 59.6 DQ Mixed 14.9 21% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 900GB free Firmware: JC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 174992399 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5879 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 154954027962 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 33302 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1906 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 12886933537 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 51 656015397 (C2) HDA temperature 37 49 77309411365 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 21 174992399 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -63939178107131 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1134426648 (F2) Unknown 100 253 829001149	60.1% Good	Read 102 Write 108 Mixed 78.4 72% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.41 105% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 721GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 174 2191 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5547 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 23035 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1189 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 176 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5370 (C2) HDA temperature 109 105 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	80.1% Excellent	Read 149 Write 130 Mixed 103 95% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.29 113% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB 659 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - $170

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	43x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 55%, 10,150 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $711

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16