Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '22 at 16:33
Run Duration	1053 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 217 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 738 71% 585 Pts	64-Core 1,141 71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PwrHis(1787 2343) ≥ 4GB CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.5% Average	Lighting 56.5 Reflection 68.7 Parallax 79.7 46% 68.3 fps	MRender 58.6 Gravity 55.3 Splatting 41.6 41% 51.8 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1.9 1122 1160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 1,317 Write 1,174 Mixed 938 SusWrite 381 213% 952 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 52.2 172% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 767 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 318 289% 455 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 282%
Crucial M550 512GB-$283 5,683 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 52GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.6 445 435 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 428 Write 447 Mixed 301 SusWrite 147 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 32.1 110% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 228 192% 282 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 111%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 378GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 492 Write 462 Mixed 394 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 44.1 145% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 260 211% 302 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 38GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 91 77 82 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 89.5 Write 85.1 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 52.6 50% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 61%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB 8,252 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 242GB free Firmware: CC37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 99 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 98.2 Write 99.8 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 33.2 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.3 176 190 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 186 Write 144 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 61 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 113%
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 227GB free Firmware: ZZ100-15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.4 54 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 47 Write 19.1 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 20.5 22% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 41%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.5 84 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 74.6 Write 71.1 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 27.8 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	73.2% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 25.9 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 21.6 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)