Asrock X99 OC Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 OC Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '22 at 15:25
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 241 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 739 75% 607 Pts	64-Core 954 59% 954 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 167 163 169 163 174 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 424 Write 165 Mixed 213 SusWrite 165 53% 241 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 13 69% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 29.7 39% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 72%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 93GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 372 337 374 351 366 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 437 Write 390 Mixed 286 SusWrite 359 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 28.9 93% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 126 117% 190 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 113%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 59GB free Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 372 337 273 242 251 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 417 Write 398 Mixed 354 SusWrite 303 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 27.4 92% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 55.1 DQ Mixed 99 98% 165 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 99%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 108GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 126 115 124 119 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 126 Write 122 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 121 72% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 37 115% 40.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 22.4 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 OC Formula Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 OC Formula

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	21x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	13x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	5x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	4x

SSD
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	8x
545s Series 256GBIntel $79Bench 96%, 17,432 samples	3x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	3x

RAM
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 4x4GBCorsairBench 77%, 245 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	3x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 85%, 1,486 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $575

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16