Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '22 at 14:49
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 80.4 1-Core 140 2-Core 284 91% 168 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 882 85% 702 Pts	64-Core 1,110 69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2095 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 60.4 Parallax 52.6 48% 57.2 fps	MRender 45.4 Gravity 53.4 Splatting 49.1 40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X02c08 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 428 Write 378 Mixed 352 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 37.1 138% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 186 140% 182 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 74GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 77 77 79 80 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 78.2 Write 54.5 Mixed 49.1 SusWrite 78.7 48% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 10GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0.9 1.2 1.9 2 2.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 1.6 9% 9.57 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8RT CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2933, 2933 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.1% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 27.2 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 26.5 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,460x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,304x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,005x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	948x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	733x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	652x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	715x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	338x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	291x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16