Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '17 at 21:07
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 73.8 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 143 57% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 227 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.3% Very good	Lighting 87.8 Reflection 88.8 Parallax 142 72% 106 fps	MRender 85.5 Gravity 97.8 Splatting 122 86% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB 5,131 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 7013 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1328 (64) Unknown 100 100 5705400 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 97 97 40 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B2) Unknown 100 100 47 (B3) Unknown 100 100 359 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6521 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 0 68722032666 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 99 76 134 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3638 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7269 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3052 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 508126	78.5% Very good	Read 511 Write 320 Mixed 348 87% 393 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 25.5 106% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 25.2 51% 106 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 106%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 9GB free Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 11 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 30162 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2498 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1047 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 488327 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 6608 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 4288450623 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 93 93 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	26.1% Poor	Read 245 Write 73 Mixed 111 31% 143 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 5.39 42% 9.91 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 5GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 80 80 6840 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 6837 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 9644 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 59489 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1816 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 115 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 84 51 269484048 (C2) HDA temperature 81 50 319815699 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 64630 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	36.9% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 71.8 Mixed 64.8 49% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.35 86% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 60%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72 4,659 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1GB free Firmware: 30.04G30 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 195 183 7241 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10721 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 24 24 55732 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1737 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 211 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10731 (C2) HDA temperature 127 100 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 19 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.1% Poor	Read 48 Write 53.4 Mixed 54.4 39% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.29 70% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 16GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16