Dell Latitude D610

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude D610  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0M7181
Memory0.6 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051002
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 21:19
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium M processor 1.86GHz-$49
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 21.1
12% 21.7 Pts
4-Core 22.9
8-Core 21.8
3% 22.3 Pts
64-Core 23
2% 23 Pts
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 10%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Dell(1028 2006)
Driver: Ver.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.5
0% 0.55 fps
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS421280H9AT00 80GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HA3OA70G Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 15
Mixed 4.64
11% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.11
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.06
15% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 16%
Mass Storage Device 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 25.8
Write 18.8
Mixed 14.7
24% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.18
21% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
2048, 512 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
6.89% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 682
6% 682 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 25%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback